Search Results for resource-allocation
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to look into how internal control and auditing procedures affect financial performance in state-owned firms.
The study focuses on the function of these technologies in increasing financial transparency, lowering financial risks, and optimizing resource allocation in public sector organizations. It also investigates the importance of internal audits in discovering errors and financial manipulation, as well as the obstacles associated with adopting these systems in the public sector. The primary premise of this study is that efficient implementation of internal control and auditing systems improves financial performance in state-owned firms by increasing transparency, lowering financial risks, and achieving better resource allocation. A descriptive analytical technique was utilized to collect qualitative and quantitative data from financial managers and internal auditors in state-owned firms using questionnaires and interviews. In addition, financial data and yearly reports were examined to identify the relationship between internal control and auditing systems and financial results. The research hypothesis was supported using statistical tools such as variance analysis and correlation analysis. One of the research's primary results is that effective use of internal control and auditing systems improves financial performance by increasing transparency, minimizing financial errors, and optimizing resource allocations. Furthermore, senior management's backing is vital to these systems' success. The research's crucial direction is to improve and develop internal control and auditing systems in state-owned firms by offering ongoing staff training and implementing new technologies to improve these systems' performance. Beyond that, complete support from top management should be ensured in order to assure the achievement of financial goals and the elimination of operational financial risks.
Abstract
The research aims to know the impact of behavioral integration of the senior management team with its sub-dimensions represented by (cooperative behavior, information exchange, participation in decision-making) in enhancing organizational prestige with its dimensions represented by (internal organizational prestige, perceived external prestige). The importance of the research is also represented by clarifying the important role played by the senior management teams at the university under study so that the university becomes highly prestigious, effective, and capable of defining itself and its presence, and keeping pace with rapid changes locally and globally in order to achieve global status compared to other universities in developed countries. The University of Mosul was chosen as a field for research, where the research applied the comprehensive inventory method to the researcher’s sample of (214) leaders represented by (the university president and his assistants, deans of colleges and assistants, and heads of departments as well as scientific centers) at the University of Mosul. However, the total of the questionnaire received (189) and (25) questionnaire forms were not received. The researcher used a questionnaire to obtain data, and the research adopted the descriptive analytical approach in order to achieve results using the statistical program (AMOS V.25). The research came out with a number of conclusions, the most important of which is that cooperation and information exchange makes members of the senior management team show solidarity and cohesion, and this cohesion translates into decision-making processes. Smoother decisions, efficient resource allocation, and strategic implementation, all of which contribute to achieving the organization’s prestige. The researcher also presented a set of proposals, the most important of which is “the necessity of expanding the basis of participation in decision-making and not limiting it only to members of the University Council by involving experts in the work of academic staff, including professors and owners.” Distinguished academic titles in executive departments for the purpose of reaching a level of competence when making decisions and implementing them effectively.”
Abstract
The research aims to clarify the mechanism for implementing the program and performance budget and its importance as a modern tool for financial reform by adopting the descriptive approach and the case study approach by reviewing the Egyptian experience in implementing this type of budget, in addition to designing a proposed model for implementing the program and performance budget in three ministries (Electricity, Construction and Housing, and Health) in line with the Iraqi national strategic objectives. The research showed that the success of the Egyptian experience in implementing this budget requires a clear institutional structure, integration between planning, financing, and implementation, and the availability of advanced information systems. The research also showed that ministries such as Health, Electricity, and Construction and Housing have appropriate capabilities for the gradual implementation of the program and performance budget, especially with the presence of projects that can be evaluated and performance monitored. This requires an explicit legal and legislative framework that requires the adoption of the program and performance budget, which is considered one of the fundamental obstacles facing implementation in Iraq.