Search Results for regulatory-oversight
Abstract
The current study aims to investigate the relationship between shadow banking and money laundering. The importance of this study lies in its contribution to enriching the theoretical and scientific literature and clarifying the impact of and relationship between shadow banking and money laundering. The significance of the study stems from the importance of shadow banking, which can be defined as financial intermediaries or non-bank financial institutions involved in lending and credit activities but subject to limited or no regulatory oversight. A hypothetical framework was developed to illustrate the relationships between the research variables, leading to the formulation of a set of hypotheses concerning direct effects and correlations. The study addressed the theoretical framework and yielded several conclusions. The results revealed a statistically significant negative effect of structured investment instruments on money laundering in the banks under study. This suggests that limiting the use of these instruments may contribute effectively to reducing money laundering risks. The results also confirmed a statistically significant negative effect of credit hedge funds on money laundering in the banks under study. This indicates that reducing transactions with these funds may significantly decrease the likelihood of their exploitation in money laundering activities. Furthermore, the findings revealed a statistically significant negative effect of commercial paper channels on money laundering in the banks under study. This indicates that reducing banks' activities in these channels represents an important measure for limiting money laundering operations. The study also proposed a set of recommendations to address the issues identified and help mitigate the risks associated with money laundering in the context of shadow banking.
Abstract
This essay discusses the many obstacles Iraq must overcome as it negotiates the swift digital transition brought about by new technology. Iraq urgently needs updated legal frameworks to handle sophisticated digital crimes that impede fair competition in light of the country's growing digital economy and emerging technical frontiers. The dynamics of digital markets cannot be adequately regulated by current anti-monopoly and competition laws since they are unable to keep up with dangers unique to the digital sphere, like information crimes. The effectiveness of Iraq's current legal, regulatory, and judicial systems in thwarting monopolistic behaviors and fostering competition in the digital age is examined in this paper. The study suggests a multifaceted strategy for bolstering Iraq's legal framework and competition laws, starting with significant investments in digital infrastructure and public-private cooperation. Increasing worker specialization, raising awareness of digital crimes, updating competition rules to match technology advancements, and broadening digital access across areas are some of the main recommendations. The report also calls on government agencies, business players, and non-governmental organizations to coordinate their activities and promotes international alliances to build technical oversight capacities. Iraq can strengthen its position in the global digital economy, encourage fair competition, and support economic growth by putting in place a robust digital regulatory framework
Abstract
This study examines the preventive role of Legal Technology (LegalTech) in monitoring anti-competitive behaviors, with a particular focus on current challenges in Iraq. The problem arises from the limitations of traditional tools in detecting collusion and monopolistic practices, in contrast to the potential offered by LegalTech solutions such as artificial intelligence algorithms and digital reporting platforms. The research adopts a descriptive-analytical and comparative methodology, reviewing successful international experiences (the European Union, Singapore, and the United Kingdom), alongside an Iraqi case study in a key sector. The underlying hypothesis suggests that while LegalTech provides promising opportunities for regulatory oversight, its effectiveness in Iraq depends largely on the development of digital and legislative infrastructures. Preliminary findings indicate that LegalTech can play the role of an "early warning mechanism" against anti-competitive practices. However, Iraq faces structural and legislative challenges that require urgent addressing.
Accordingly, the research seeks to provide a cognitive and policy contribution that deepens understanding of the preventive role of LegalTech and supporting Iraqi decision-makers in addressing current challenges, thereby fostering a fairer and more competitive economic environment.