Cover
Volume 7, Issue Speical 7 (2026)

Published: November 5, 2026

Pages: 323-340

Research Article

The Role of digital entrepreneurship as a mediating variable in the relationship between smart leadership and the strategic ambidexterity of human resources: An exploratory analytical study in a number of software and smart application companies in Najaf Governorate

Amer A. Al-Thabhawee 1 Noor S. J. Al-Balaghi 1 Mohammed F. S. Al-Amara 2
1College of Administration and Economics, University of Kufa, Najaf, Iraq
2Cordoba Private University, Najaf, Iraq
History
  • Received: August 15, 2026
  • Available Online: November 5, 2026
DOI

https://doi.org/10.56967/ejfb20261036

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the role of digital entrepreneurship as a mediating variable in the relationship between smart leadership and the strategic ambidexterity of human resources in a number of software and smart application companies in Najaf Governorate. The study is based on the assumption that smart leadership, with its dimensions (emotional intelligence, spiritual intelligence, and rational intelligence), represents a modern approach to enhancing the strategic capabilities of human resources; however, its impact is strengthened through the adoption of digital entrepreneurship practices within the organization. The study adopts a descriptive-analytical approach with an exploratory orientation. The research population consisted of 93 employees across ten companies, while the sample included 70 respondents, representing a 75% response rate. Data were collected באמצעות a questionnaire based on established scientific scales and analyzed using appropriate statistical methods to test the relationships of influence and the mediating role. The results revealed a significant positive effect of smart leadership on the strategic ambidexterity of human resources, as well as a significant effect of smart leadership on enhancing digital entrepreneurship. The findings also indicated that digital entrepreneurship strengthens the relationship between smart leadership and strategic ambidexterity, reflecting its partial mediating role. Furthermore, the results confirmed that adopting digital entrepreneurship practices enhances the ability of human resources to explore and exploit opportunities, thereby supporting the achievement of strategic excellence for organizations.

Keywords

References

  1. Al-Karaawi, Saja Jawad Hussein. (2016). The Role of Smart Leadership Dimensions in Transforming into Smart Organizations through the Mediating Role of Organizational Learning. Published Master's Thesis, Iraq.
  2. Al-Kurd, Aisha Ahmad, and Al-Farra, Majed Mohammad Abd Al-Salam. (2016). Rational and Emotional Intelligence as an Approach to Enhancing Competitive Advantage in Technical Colleges in the Gaza Strip. Published Master's Thesis, Palestine.
  3. Hussein, Mohammad Abd Al-Hadi. (2011). Smart Leadership. 1st ed., Cairo.
  4. Balta, Maria Elisavet. (2008). The Impact Of Business Environment And Boards Of Directors On Strategic Decision-Making: A Case Study Of Greek Listed Companies. Brunel University.
  5. Banahan, Eoin. (2020). Smart Leadership for Smart Organisations-D5. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.15436.85121.
  6. Banahan, Eoin. (2021). Towards an Understanding of Smart Leadership.
  7. Chang, Yuan-Chieh; Yang, Phil Y.; & Chen, Ming-Huei. (2009). The determinants of academic research commercial performance: Towards an organizational ambidexterity perspective. Research Policy, 38(12)..
  8. Carmeli, Abraham; & Halevi, Yitzack Meyrav. (2009). How top management team behavioral integration and behavioral complexity enable organizational ambidexterity: The moderating role of contextual ambidexterity. The Leadership Quarterly, 20, 207–218.
  9. Dawood, A. A. (2021). A study to identify the practice of sports activity, emotional smartness and adaptation with stress in teens. Journal of Studies and Researches of Sport Education. (68)
  10. Esmaili, M.; Zareh, H.; & Golverdi, M. (2014). Spiritual intelligence: Aspects, components and guidelines to promote it. International Journal of Management Accounting and Economics, 1, 162–174
  11. Güldenberg, S.; & Konrath, H. (2004). Intelligent leadership in knowledge-based organizations: An empirical study. In Proceedings of the Fifth European Conference on Organizational Knowledge, Learning, and Capabilities, University of Innsbruck, Austria, 1–25.
  12. He, Zi-Lin; & Wong, Poh-Kam. (2004). Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science, 15(4)..
  13. Huang, Pei-Wen. (2010). Why and how to be ambidextrous? The relationship between environmental factors, innovation strategy and organizational capabilities. PhD Thesis, Kaohsiung University, Taiwan.
  14. Judge, William Q.; & Blocker, Christopher P. (2008). Organizational capacity for change and strategic ambidexterity: Flying the plane while rewiring it. European Journal of Marketing, 42(9/10)..
  15. Lichtenthaler, Ulrich. (2021). SMART Leadership: Innovative Führung für die neue Normalität. Ideen- und Innovationsmanagement. https://doi.org/10.37307/j.2198-3151.2021.02.06.
  16. Miles, Morgan; & Darroch, Jenny. (2006). Large firms, entrepreneurial marketing processes, and the cycle of competitive advantage. European Journal of Marketing, 38(9)..
  17. Muller-Lankenau, Claas; Wehmeyer, Kai; & Klein, Stefan. (2006). Strategic channel alignment: An analysis of the configuration of physical and virtual marketing channels. ISEB, 187–216.
  18. O’Reilly, Charles; Harreld, J. Bruce; & Tushman, Michael L. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: IBM and emerging business opportunities. California Management Review, 51(4)..
  19. Pai, Ashwin. (2007). Overcoming the innovator’s dilemma through organizational ambidexterity within the Indian pharmaceutical industry. University of Nottingham.
  20. Prange, Christiane; & Schlegelmilch, Bodo B. (2009). The role of ambidexterity in marketing strategy implementation: Resolving the exploration–exploitation dilemma. Journal of VHB, 2.
  21. Reilly, Marty. (2010). A reconceptualisation of ambidexterity: How subsidiaries can use their capabilities and knowledge to build subsidiary bargaining power. Cork Institute of Technology.
  22. Simsek, Zeki. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: Towards a multilevel understanding. Journal of Management Studies, University of Connecticut.
  23. Simsek, Zeki; Heavey, Ciaran; Veiga, John F.; & Souder, David. (2009). A typology for aligning organizational ambidexterity’s conceptualizations, antecedents, and outcomes. Journal of Management Studies, 46(5)..
  24. Stienstra, Marten. (2008). Strategic renewal in regulatory environments. Erasmus University Rotterdam.
  25. SWilson, N.; Hough, E.; Hamilton, A.; Verdonck, M.; & Clark, R. (2021). Development and test-retest reliability assessment of a low-cost, 3D printed tool for assessing different aspects of hand dexterity. Journal of Hand Therapy.
  26. Vaughan, F. (2002). What is spiritual intelligence? Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 42(2), 16–33.
  27. Yong, J.; MacDermid, J. C.; Packham, T.; Bobos, P.; Richardson, J.; & Moll, S. (2021). Performance-based outcome measures of dexterity and hand function in persons with hand and wrist injuries: A scoping review. Journal of Hand Therapy
  28. Yusof, Faizal Mohamed; & Abdul Aziz, Rozainun. (2008). Strategic adaptation and the value of forecasts: The development of a conceptual framework. Journal of Business Economics and Management, University of Technology, Malaysia.
  29. Zhou, Kevin Zheng; & Wu, Fang. (2010). Technological capability, strategic flexibility, and product innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 31, 547–561.
  30. Camps, C., Kraus, S., Thomas, A., Tiberius, V., & Jones, P. (2024). Digital entrepreneurship: A review, research synthesis, and development of a framework. Technology in Society, 84, 103124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.103124 (https://www.google.com/search?q=https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.103124)
  31. Sheikh, Noor Al-Din, et al. “An empirical analysis of the motivating factors for unemployed individuals to engage in digital entrepreneurship in the Sultanate of Oman: Focus on technological infrastructure.” Sustainability 15.17 (2023): 12953.
  32. Orozova, Daniela, Nadezhda Angelova, and Zlatin Zlatev. "New Skills and Knowledge for Digital Entrepreneurs in the Age of Artificial Intelligence." European Conference on Innovation and Entrepreneurship. International Academic Conferences Limited, 2024.
  33. Brown, Eric, and Leo-Paul Dana. "Digital Entrepreneurship: Some Features of New Social Interactions". Canadian Journal of Management Science/Canadian Journal of Management Science 39.3 (2022): 237-243.
  34. Hommel, Kristin, and Peter M. Bican. "Digital entrepreneurship in finance: Fintechs and funding decision criteria." Sustainability 12.19 (2020): 8035.
  35. Gregory, Patrick, and Patrick Holzman. "Sustainable Digital Entrepreneurship: A Business Model Perspective on Integrating Digital Technologies to Create Social and Environmental Value." Cleaner Production Journal 272 (2020): 122817.
  36. Sidira, Darshana, Chi Wei Tan, and Dongming Xu. "Digital business transformation in innovation and entrepreneurship." Information and Management 59.3 (2022): 103620.
  37. Radovic-Markovic, Mirjana. "Technological development and creative destruction: Challenges of digital transformation in entrepreneurship, work and education". Intelektinė ekonomika 19.1 (2025): 10-31.
  38. Adam, Sabrinah, et al. "The effectiveness of digital entrepreneurship ecosystem toward enriching income generation: The moderating role of entrepreneurial intention." Sage Open 15.1 (2025): 21582440241305361.
  39. Sudirman, Ningsi. "Digital Entrepreneurship and Business Innovation: Strategies for Indonesian SMEs in the Era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution". Journal of Indonesian Researchers in Social Research 5.1 (2025): 24-34.
  40. Otiu, Erko, et al. "The digital entrepreneurship landscape in developing Asia: insights from the Global Digital Entrepreneurship Systems Index". European Journal of Innovation Management 28.7 (2025): 2845-2872.