Cover
Volume 7, Issue Speical 7 (2026)

Published: November 5, 2026

Pages: 17-28

Research Article

The impact of financial technology on enhancing tax collection in Iraq: A standard analytical study for the period 2018–2022

Abstract

This research paper aims to analyze and measure the impact of Financial Technology (FinTech) spread on enhancing tax collection performance and mitigating tax evasion in Iraq over the period 2018–2022. The study adopts both descriptive-analytical and econometric approaches. A composite index—the Digital Financial Services Spread Index (DFSDI)—was constructed as the independent variable based on the density of Automated Teller Machines (ATMs), Point of Sale (POS) terminals, and Point of Card (POC) payment devices, using the Min-Max normalization method. Tax collection performance (the dependent variable) was measured indirectly through the ratio of tax revenues to non-oil Gross Domestic Product (GDP). The empirical results using Pearson correlation analysis and Simple Linear Regression showed no statistically significant relationship or impact of the DFSDI index on the tax collection ratio at a significance level of )alpha = 0.05( The correlation coefficient was )r = -0.541( with a )p-value of 0.346(, and the coefficient of determination was )R2 = 0.293( with an statistically insignificant slope coefficient of )beta = -2.297( (p=0.346). Consequently, the null hypothesis (H0) was not rejected. The economic interpretation suggests that while the expansion of digital financial services infrastructure serves as an enabling tool, it does not automatically translate into improved tax collection without direct integration and electronic linkage with tax administration processes such as e-invoicing, e-filing, automated tax payments, and database cross-checking—alongside limitations imposed by the short time series. The paper concludes that FinTech adoption must be part of a comprehensive tax reform strategy incorporating direct digitalization and institutional integration

References

  1. Al-Khair, Nafisa. Al-Taqniyat al-Maliyya al-Haditha. Arab Monetary Fund, 2020, United Arab Emirates.
  2. Saudi FinTech, Annual Report. Saudi Central Bank, 2020, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
  3. Arab Monetary Fund. Taqrir Marsad al-Bi’āt al-Riqābiyya wa al-Ikhtibāriyya lil-Taqniyat al-Maliyya al-Haditha fi al-Duwal al-‘Arabiyya. First Edition, 2021.
  4. Abd al-Rahim, Wahiba, Ben Qaddour, Ashwaq. (2018). Tawajjuhat al-Tiknulujiya al-Maliyya ‘ala Daw’ Tajārib Sharikat Najihah. Majallat al-Ijtihad lil-Dirasat al-Qanuniyya wa al-Iqtisadiyya, 7(3), 11–35.
  5. FinTech Egypt. Taqrir Manzur al-Taqniyat al-Maliyya. Central Bank of Egypt, 2021, Egypt.
  6. MAGNiTT, Abu Dhabi Global Market. Taqrir Mashari‘ al-Taqniyat al-Maliyya fi al-Sharq al-Awsat wa Shamal Ifriqiya. MAGNiTT Platform in Collaboration with Abu Dhabi Global Market, 2019.
  7. Central Bank of Iraq, Department of Statistics. Taqrir al-Istiqrar al-Mali, 2018–2022, Iraq.
  8. Alm, J. (2012). Measuring, explaining, and controlling tax evasion: Lessons from theory and practice. International Tax and Public Finance, 19(1), 54–77
  9. Agnar Sandmo. (2005). The theory of tax evasion: A retrospective view. National Tax Journal, 58(4), 643–663.
  10. Alm, J. (2019). What motivates tax compliance? Journal of Economic Surveys, 33(2), 353–388
  11. Broeders , Dirk & prenio , (2018) , innovative technology in financial supervision (suptech)-the experience of early users, bank of international settlements
  12. CGAP-EY ,(2020), FinTech Landscaping in the Arab World Regional Report
  13. Di Castri, S., Grasser, M., Mestanza, J. M., & Ongwae, J. (2022). State of SupTech Report 2022. Available at SSRN 4322943.
  14. Egyptian Tax Authority. (2023). Annual fiscal performance report. Ministry of Finance, Egypt.
  15. Implications of fintech developments for banks and bank supervisors, 2018, Basel Committee on Banking Supervision,Bank for International Settlements .
  16. International Monetary Fund. (2018). Fintech and financial services: Initial considerations. International Monetary Fund.
  17. International Monetary Fund. (2024). Government finance statistics database. IMF Data Portal. https://data.imf.org
  18. IOSCO Research Report on Financial Technologies (Fintech), 2017 , International Organization of Securities Commissions.
  19. KPMG. (2020). KPMG annual report 2020.
  20. Krieger, T. (2021). A model-theoretical analysis for digital tax administrations. International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Economy, 2(34).
  21. Kwon, Y., Park, C., & Ziegler, T. (2023). Managing fintech risks: Policy and regulatory implications. Asian Development Bank
  22. Lukonga, Ms Inutu, (2018). Fintech, inclusive growth and cyber risks: Focus on the MENAP and CCA regions , IMF Working Pape,International Monetary Fund.
  23. Martinez-Vazquez, J. (2021). Adapting fiscal decentralization design to combat climate change (p. 114). Washington, DC, USA: World Bank.
  24. international Monetary Fund. (2025). Iraq: Article IV Consultation—Staff Report. Washington, DC: IMF.
  25. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2025). Tax administration 2025: Comparative information on OECD and other advanced and emerging economies. OECD Publishing
  26. OECD. (2020). Tax administration 3.0: The digital transformation of tax administration. OECDPublishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/ca274cc5-en
  27. World Bank. (n.d.). Tax revenue (% of GDP). World Bank DataBank. World Bank DataBank – Tax revenue