Cover
Volume 7, Special Issue 6 (2026)

Published: October 25, 2026

Pages: 285-296

Research Article

Good Digital Governance and Its Role in Enhancing Strategic Sovereignt: An Applied Study on a Sample of Faculty Members at Iraqi Private Universities

Nidhal A. Al-Maliki 1 Hussein M. A. Kashkoul 2 Fawziya H. Al-Hilali 3 Fahim A. M. Al-Mayali 3
1Acconting department, College of Administration and Economics, University of Warith Al-Anbiyaa, Karbala, Iraq
2Department of Digital Media, College of Media, University of Warith Al-Anbiyaa, Karbala, Iraq
3Department of Oil and Gas Economics, College of Administration and Economics, University of Warith Al-Anbiyaa, Karbala, Iraq
History
  • Received: August 14, 2026
  • Available Online: October 25, 2026
DOI

https://doi.org/10.56967/ejfb2026999

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the role of good digital governance in enhancing strategic sovereignty in Iraqi private universities by revealing the nature of the relationship and impact between the two variables in light of the accelerating digital transformation in the higher education sector. The study adopted a descriptive-analytical approach, and data were collected using an electronic questionnaire distributed to a sample of professors from Iraqi private universities. The number of valid responses for analysis was 154. Good digital governance was measured through five main dimensions: digital accountability, digital transparency, fairness and equity, digital participation, and service efficiency. Strategic sovereignty was measured through a set of indicators related to decision independence and the institutional capacity to plan and control information resources. The results of the statistical analysis showed a strong, statistically significant positive correlation between good digital governance and strategic sovereignty, with a correlation coefficient (R = 0.72) at a significance level of (p < 0.001), indicating the strength of the relationship between the two variables. The regression analysis revealed that the dimensions of good digital governance collectively explain approximately 52% of the changes in strategic sovereignty (R² = 0.52), with a statistically significant overall standardized effect size (β = 0.68). At the dimension level, the results showed that digital transparency, digital accountability, and service efficiency were the most influential dimensions in enhancing strategic sovereignty, followed by digital participation and fairness and equity. This underscores the pivotal role of these practices in supporting the independence of strategic decision-making and strengthening institutional capacity to respond to challenges.

Keywords

References

  1. Mansour, M. A. H., & Amr. (2024). Al-hawkama al-raqamiyyah wa idarat al-makhاطir al-mustaqbaliyyah bi-munazzamat al-ri'ayah al-ijtima'iyyah [Digital governance and future risk management in social welfare organizations]. Majallat Kulliyat al-Khidmah al-Ijtima'iyyah lil-Dirasat wa al-Buhuth al-Ijtima'iyyah, 34(1), 605–649.
  2. Issa, I. S., Al-Mousawi, I. N. H., & Al-Masoudi, F. F. S. (2024). Taqdir dallat al-baqa' bi-al-fatrah li-tawzi' Frechet li-bayanat al-dababiyyah li-marad sartan al-dimagh fi Muhafazat Karbala' al-Muqaddasah [Estimation of the interval survival function for the Fréchet distribution of fuzzy data on brain cancer in Holy Karbala Governorate]. Majallat Warith al-'Ilmiyyah, 6(special issue).
  3. Al-Masoudi, F. F. S., Hassan, H. A., & Hadi, A. H. (2024). Tahlil al-'alaqah bayna al-tijarah al-kharijiyyah al-bayniyyah wa ba'd al-mu'ashshirat al-iqtisadiyyah al-kulliyyah lil-Sa'udiyyah lil-muddah (2004–2021) [Analysis of the relationship between intra-regional foreign trade and selected macroeconomic indicators of Saudi Arabia during 2004–2021]. Majallat Warith al-'Ilmiyyah, 6(18).
  4. Al-Hamdani, M. M., & Kazim, D. A. M. (2023). Thaqafat al-surah wa fa'aliyyatuha fi ta'زيز al-taswiq al-raqami fi al-jami'at al-ahliyyah: Dirasah istitla'iyyah tahliliyyah li-ara' 'ayyinah min talabat Jami'at Warith al-Anbiya' [Image culture and its effectiveness in enhancing digital marketing in private universities: An analytical survey of students at the University of Warith Al-Anbiyaa]. Majallat Warith al-'Ilmiyyah, 5.
  5. Al-Hamdani, M. M., & Mohsen, B. A. (2024). Dawr al-masarif al-khadra' fi ta'زيز al-tamayuz al-ma'rifi lil-mu'assasat al-masrafiyyah: Dirasah istitla'iyyah li-ara' 'ayyinah min al-'amilin fi Masraf al-'Iraqi lil-Tijarah fi Muhafazatay Karbala' al-Muqaddasah wa Baghdad [The role of green banks in enhancing knowledge excellence in banking institutions: A survey of employees of the Trade Bank of Iraq in Karbala and Baghdad]. Majallat Warith al-'Ilmiyyah, 6(special issue).
  6. Al-Haboubi, M. N. H. (2022). Abtal al-ma'rifah ka-mutaghayyir tafa'uli fi al-'alaqah ma bayna al-bara'ah al-istratijiyyah wa al-ada' al-ma'rifi: Dirasah istitla'iyyah tahliliyyah li-ara' 'ayyinah min muwazzafi Markaz al-Bahth wa al-Ta'hil al-Ma'lوماتi fi Jami'at al-Kufah [Knowledge champions as a moderating variable in the relationship between strategic ambidexterity and knowledge performance: An analytical survey of employees at the Center for Research and Information Rehabilitation, University of Kufa]. 10(4).
  7. Al-Masoudi, F. F. S., Hassan, H. A., & Hadi, A. H. (2024). Tahlil al-'alaqah bayna al-tijarah al-kharijiyyah al-bayniyyah wa ba'd al-mu'ashshirat al-iqtisadiyyah al-kulliyyah lil-Sa'udiyyah lil-muddah (2004–2021) [Analysis of the relationship between intra-regional foreign trade and selected macroeconomic indicators of Saudi Arabia during 2004–2021]. Majallat Warith al-'Ilmiyyah, 6(18).Bai, S. R., & Thimmaiah, D. N. (2024). Bridging Digital and Good Governance: A Review of E-Governance Frameworks and Challenges. EPRA International Journal of Economic and Business Review, 12(9).
  8. Muñoz-Pallaroso, E. K., Romero-Vásquez, X. M., Pallaroso-Granizo, R. Y., & Oviedo-Bayas, B. (2025). Gobernanza digital y transformación del Estado. Impacto de la tecnología en la gestión pública. Revista Metropolitana de Ciencias Aplicadas, 8(3), 96-100.
  9. Dang, M. T., & Vu, T. L. (2024). Good governance and anti-corruption: advantages and challenges in the era of digital technology. Revista Gestão & Tecnologia, 24(3), 128–154. https://doi.org/10.20397/21776652/2024.v24i3.2899
  10. Secinaro, S., Brescia, V., & Calandra, D. (2024). Internet reporting and digital governance: evidence from multiple Italian municipalities (pp. 283–301). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800888456.0002
  11. Batool, S., Gill, S. A., Javaid, S., & Khan, A. J. (2021). Good governance via E-Governance: moving towards digitalization for a digital economy. Review of applied management and social sciences, 4(4), 823-836.
  12. Kirana, N. W. I., & Majid, N. (2022). Challenges of digital transformation on good governance for improving public services quality. Nusantara Science and Technology Proceedings, 4(8), 43-47.
  13. OECD. (2023). Digital Government Review of Romania: Towards a Digitally Mature Government. OECD Publications Centre.
  14. Shchennikova, I. I. (2025). Public Management Modernization Paths: A Critical Narrative Review of Digital Government and Good Governance. Cifrovoe Pravo, 5(1), 94–104. https://doi.org/10.38044/2686-9136-2024-5-1-94-104
  15. Azizbayov, E. I. (2025). DIGITAL ASPECTS OF GOOD GOVERNANCE: EXPERIENCE OF THE REPUBLIC OF AZERBAIJAN. Baltic Journal of Legal and Social Sciences, (3), 105-114.
  16. Ardiansyah, S., Yorman, Y., & Rassyi, S. F. (2026). Digital Citizenship Education for Good Governance: A Character-Based Approach Rooted in Local Wisdom. Innovations in Pedagogy and Technology, 2(1), 24-37.
  17. Singh, S. (2026). Good Governance And Public Administration: A Critical Analysis Of Institutional Effectiveness. International Journal of Research in Political Science and Public Administration p-ISSN 3117-5902 e-ISSN 3117-5910, 2(1), 1-8.
  18. Molnár, A., & Harnos, É. J. (2024). From Quasi-Sovereignty to Full Sovereignty? The Interpretations of Strategic Autonomy and Sovereignty in the European Union. Anali Hrvatskog Politološkog Društva. https://doi.org/10.20901/an.21.02
  19. Romanova, T. A., & Mazanik, S. V. (2022). Coordinative Discourse of Strategic Sovereignty Tilting the European Union’s Institutional Balance. Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta, 15(5), 79–112. https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2022-5-86-79-112
  20. Коцур, Г. (2024). Concepts of strategic sovereignty and autonomy and the image of the future in the official discourse of the eu. Вестник Пермского Университета, 18(1), 103–111. https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2024-1-103-111
  21. Hrubec, M. (2022). Macro-regional Sovereignty? China, the USA, the EU. Perspectives on Global Development and Technology, 20(5–6), 492–508. https://doi.org/10.1163/1569149712341608
  22. Hrubec, M. (2022). Strategic sovereignty (pp. 33–50). Routledge eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/b22839-4